紐約一家人搜尋壓力鍋、背包、壓力鍋炸彈,引來警方反恐調查

紐約一家人搜尋「壓力鍋」、「背包」引來警方反恐調查

Catalano在部落格寫道,周三早上紐約市蘇福客郡自稱是「聯合反恐工作小組」的六名警察來到家中,詢問她的工作、她丈夫祖籍等問題,以便了解和他們一家人上網搜尋「壓力鍋」、「背包」之間是否有什麼關聯。 

原來是這家人各別搜尋的主題引起警方的注意與監視。Catalano表示,這是因為她曾搜尋「壓力鍋」,任職於電腦公司的丈夫搜尋過「背包」,而二十歲的兒子則是閱讀關於網路上製作壓力鍋炸彈資訊相關的新聞報導並點入相關連結。

蘇福客郡警方也發出聲明解釋原因,因為警方接獲一家位於灣區的電腦公司通報,該公司一名前員工曾透過公司電腦進行過「壓力鍋炸彈」及「背包」的可疑搜尋。


pressure cookers, backpacks and quinoa, oh my!

It was a confluence of magnificent proportions that led six agents from the joint terrorism task force to knock on my door Wednesday morning. Little did we know our seemingly innocent, if curious to a fault, Googling of certain things was creating a perfect storm of terrorism profiling. Because somewhere out there, someone was watching. Someone whose job it is to piece together the things people do on the internet raised the red flag when they saw our search history.

Most of it was innocent enough. I had researched pressure cookers. My husband was looking for a backpack. And maybe in another time those two things together would have seemed innocuous, but we are in “these times” now. And in these times, when things like the Boston bombing happen, you spend a lot of time on the internet reading about it and, if you are my exceedingly curious news junkie of a twenty-year-old son, you click a lot of links when you read the myriad of stories. You might just read a CNN piece about how bomb making instructions are readily available on the internet and you will in all probability, if you are that kid, click the link provided.

Which might not raise any red flags. Because who wasn’t reading those stories? Who wasn’t clicking those links? But my son’s reading habits combined with my search for a pressure cooker and my husband’s search for a backpack set off an alarm of sorts at the joint terrorism task force headquarters.

That’s how I imagine it played out, anyhow. Lots of bells and whistles and a crowd of task force workers huddled around a computer screen looking at our Google history.

This was weeks ago. I don’t know what took them so long to get here. Maybe they were waiting for some other devious Google search to show up but “what the hell do I do with quinoa” and “Is A-Rod suspended yet” didn’t fit into the equation so they just moved in based on those older searches.

I was at work when it happened. My husband called me as soon as it was over, almost laughing about it but I wasn’t joining in the laughter. His call left me shaken and anxious.

What happened was this: At about 9:00 am, my husband, who happened to be home yesterday, was sitting in the living room with our two dogs when he heard a couple of cars pull up outside. He looked out the window and saw three black SUVs in front of our house; two at the curb in front and one pulled up behind my husband’s Jeep in the driveway, as if to block him from leaving.

Six gentleman in casual clothes emerged from the vehicles and spread out as they walked toward the house, two toward the backyard on one side, two on the other side, two toward the front door.

A million things went through my husband’s head. None of which were right. He walked outside and the men greeted him by flashing badges. He could see they all had guns holstered in their waistbands.

“Are you [name redacted]?” one asked while glancing at a clipboard. He affirmed that was indeed him, and was asked if they could come in. Sure, he said.

They asked if they could search the house, though it turned out to be just a cursory search. They walked around the living room, studied the books on the shelf (nope, no bomb making books, no Anarchist Cookbook), looked at all our pictures, glanced into our bedroom, pet our dogs. They asked if they could go in my son’s bedroom but when my husband said my son was sleeping in there, they let it be.

Meanwhile, they were peppering my husband with questions. Where is he from? Where are his parents from? They asked about me, where was I, where do I work, where do my parents live. Do you have any bombs, they asked. Do you own a pressure cooker? My husband said no, but we have a rice cooker. Can you make a bomb with that? My husband said no, my wife uses it to make quinoa. What the hell is quinoa, they asked.

They searched the backyard. They walked around the garage, as much as one could walk around a garage strewn with yardworking equipment and various junk. They went back in the house and asked more questions.

Have you ever looked up how to make a pressure cooker bomb? My husband, ever the oppositional kind, asked them if they themselves weren’t curious as to how a pressure cooker bomb works, if they ever looked it up. Two of them admitted they did.

By this point they had realized they were not dealing with terrorists. They asked my husband about his work, his visits to South Korea and China. The tone was conversational.

They never asked to see the computers on which the searches were done. They never opened a drawer or a cabinet. They left two rooms unsearched. I guess we didn’t fit the exact profile they were looking for so they were just going through the motions.

They mentioned that they do this about 100 times a week. And that 99 of those visits turn out to be nothing. I don’t know what happens on the other 1% of visits and I’m not sure I want to know what my neighbors are up to.

45 minutes later, they shook my husband’s hand and left. That’s when he called me and relayed the story. That’s when I felt a sense of creeping dread take over. What else had I looked up? What kind of searches did I do that alone seemed innocent enough but put together could make someone suspicious? Were they judging me because my house was a mess (Oh my god, the joint terrorism task force was in my house and there were dirty dishes in my sink!). Mostly I felt a great sense of anxiety. This is where we are at. Where you have no expectation of privacy. Where trying to learn how to cook some lentils could possibly land you on a watch list. Where you have to watch every little thing you do because someone else is watching every little thing you do.

All I know is if I’m going to buy a pressure cooker in the near future, I’m not doing it online.

I’m scared. And not of the right things.

CLARIFICATION AND UPDATE

We found out through the Suffolk Police Department that the searches involved also things my husband looked up at his old job. We were not made aware of this at the time of questioning and were led to believe it was solely from searches from within our house.

I did not lie or make it up. I wrote the piece with the information that was given. What was withheld from us obviously could not be a part of a story I wrote based on what happened yesterday.

The piece I wrote was the story as we knew it with the information we were told. None of it was fabricated. If you know me, you know I would never do that.

If it was misleading, just know that my intention was the truth. And that was what I knew as the truth until about ten minutes ago. That there were other circumstances involved was something we all were unaware of.

Thank you.

壓力鍋,背包和藜,噢,我的!

這是一個宏偉的比例,導致六個代理商的聯合反恐特遣部隊週三早上敲我的門匯合。我們一點也不知道我們看似無辜的,如果好奇故障,谷歌搜索某些東西,創造一個完美的風暴恐怖主義分析。因為那裡的某處,有人看。其工作是拼湊的人做的事情,在互聯網上有人提出了紅旗,當他們看到我們的搜索歷史。

大多數是無辜的。我研究過的壓力鍋。我丈夫一直在尋找一個背包。也許在另一個時間這兩件事情放在一起本來似乎是無害的,但現在我們是在“這些時代”。在這些時候,像波士頓轟炸的事情發生時,你花了大量的時間在互聯網上閱讀它,如果你是一個21歲的兒子我非常好奇的新聞迷,你點擊了很多環節當你讀了無數的故事。你可能只是讀取CNN的一塊如何製造炸彈的指示很容易在互聯網上,你會在所有的可能性,如果你是那小子,單擊提供的鏈接。

這可能不會引發任何的紅旗。因為誰不讀這些故事嗎?誰沒有點擊這些鏈接?但我兒子的閱讀習慣,結合我的搜索壓力鍋和我丈夫的一個背包搜索在聯合反恐任務部隊總部掀起了各種各樣的報警。

這就是我想像它發揮出來,無論如何。大量的鐘聲和口哨聲和人群專案組人員圍著電腦屏幕看我們谷歌的歷史。

這是幾個星期前。我不知道他們花了這麼久才在這裡。也許他們正在等待其他一些狡猾的谷歌搜索顯示,但“什麼是地獄,我該怎麼辦藜”和“一桿暫停,但”不適合入方程,所以他們剛搬到根據那些舊的搜索。

當它發生的時候,我在工作。只要它了,我的丈夫叫我幾乎笑,但我並沒有加入的笑聲。他的電話我震驚和焦慮。

事情是這樣的:在上午9:00左右,我的丈夫,誰正好是昨天回家,坐在客廳裡與我們的兩隻狗,當他聽到一對夫婦的車在外面拉起。他看著窗外,看到三個黑色的SUV在我們家門口,兩個在路邊的前面,一把拉住了我丈夫的後面吉普車在車道上,彷彿要阻止他離開。

六紳士休閒服從車輛出現和蔓延,因為他們朝房子走去,兩個朝向後院一側,在另一側,兩個​​向前門。

經歷了一百萬件事情我丈夫的頭上。其中沒有一個是正確的。他走到外面,閃光徽章的男子跟他打招呼。他能看到他們有槍在他們的腰帶皮套。

“你[節錄的名字嗎?”一問,同時掃了一眼剪貼板。他確認說,的確是他,問他們是否可以進來,當然,他說。

他們問他們是否可以搜索的房子,雖然它只是一個粗略的搜索。他們走來走去客廳,研究了書架上的書(不,沒有製造炸彈的書,沒有無政府主義者食譜),看著我們的照片,到我們的臥室瞥了一眼,寵物狗。他們問他們是否可以在我兒子的臥室去,但是當我的丈夫說,他們讓我的兒子在那裡睡覺吧。

同時,他們被尖刻的問題與我的丈夫。他從哪兒來?他的父母在哪裡?他們問我,我在哪裡,在做我的工作,我的父母住在哪裡。 ,他們問你有任何炸彈。你自己的壓力鍋?我的丈夫說沒有,但我們有一個電飯煲。你能炸彈?我的丈夫說沒有,我的妻子,用它來使藜。到底是什麼藜,他們問。

他們搜查了後院。他們圍繞車庫走去,不亞於一個可以走動一個車庫散落與yardworking設備和各種垃圾。他們回到家裡和問更多的問題。

你曾經看著如何使壓力鍋炸彈?我的丈夫,永遠是一種對立的,問他們,如果他們本身並非好奇如何壓力鍋炸彈,如果他們曾經看著它。他們兩個人承認他們做到了。

這一點,他們已經意識到他們不與恐怖分子打交道。他們問我的丈夫對他的工作,他訪問韓國和中國。的語氣會話。

他們從來沒有要求看電腦上進行搜索。他們從來沒有打開抽屜或櫥櫃。他們留下了兩個房間未搜索。我想我們不適合他們正在尋找的確切輪廓所以他們只是走過場。

他們提到,他們這樣做一個星期約100倍。 99這些訪問是什麼。我不知道會發生什麼其他的1%的訪問,我不知道,我想知道我的鄰居是什麼。

45分鐘後,他們握了握我的丈夫的手,離開了。這時候,他打電話給我,轉述故事。這時候,我感到一種匍匐恐懼接管。什麼我抬頭?什麼樣的搜索,我做了這本身似乎是無辜的,但放在一起可以使可疑的人嗎?他們來看我,因為我的房子是一個爛攤子(噢,我的上帝,聯合反恐特遣部隊是我的房子,我的水槽有臟碗碟!)。主要是我覺得一個偉大的焦慮感。這是我們在哪裡。你在哪裡有沒有隱私。在努力學習如何煮一些扁豆可能登陸你觀察名單。如果你有看你做的每一件小事,因為別人看你做的每一件小事。

我所知道的是,如果我打算購買一個壓力鍋在不久的將來,我沒有做在線。

我很害怕。不正確的事。

澄清和更新

我們發現,通過薩福克警察局搜查還涉及我的丈夫抬頭看了看他的老工作的事情。我們沒有意識到這一點在問話的時候,被引導去相信它純粹是從我們的房子內搜索。

我沒騙補回來。我寫的一塊信息。什麼隱瞞,顯然不可能是一個故事,我寫的基於對昨天發生的事情的一部分。

這件作品我寫的是故事,因為我們知道我們被告知的信息。但這些都不是捏造的。如果你了解我,你知道我絕不會那樣做。

如果它是誤導性的,只知道我的意圖是真理。這就是我所知道的真相,直到大約10分鐘前。有其他情況,我們都是不知道的東西。

謝謝。


嘿嘿~這叫做「凡走過必留下痕跡」!至少應該要用Google、Bing等不同的搜尋引擎,這樣才比較難以一次抓到!

另外,透過公司電腦進行過「壓力鍋炸彈」及「背包」的可疑搜尋,這種記錄會留在電腦的「瀏覽器歷史搜尋」裡面,也可能會留在「防火牆」的記錄裡面!

🍎たったひとつの真実見抜く、見た目は大人、頭脳は子供、その名は名馬鹿ヒカル!🍏

竟然有网络监控!希望详细

我要成為幸運的一般會社員

所以說史諾登是對的阿;美國的菱鏡計劃已經開始影響他們老百姓的生活了;進一步想,會不會影響他們的生活品質?

退一步說,因為你害怕,所以一切都是嫌疑犯.......然後呢?再來就是"莫須有"或是權力濫用的問題摟.......

這種情節就像是「全民公敵」裡面「濫用國安局之高科技配備,透過無線衛星連接網路可進行即時影像追蹤,在鋼筆、手機、手錶、衣服、以及皮鞋等物品,裝上竊聽器及追蹤器,進行地毯式的追捕」!

只要你膽敢在Google、Bing常常搜尋「壓力鍋」+「背包」還是「芭樂」「鳳梨」等關鍵字,系統就會自動通知國安局,派警察去當地查看!


黑人律師威爾‧史密斯,發現其當事人之對造﹙黑幫首腦﹚違反法院所發出的禁制令,擅自接觸受法院禁止之對象。於是史密斯透過友人協助,取得黑幫老大違法接觸之錄影帶後,獨闖龍潭與黑幫老大談判,埋下這位老大極欲取得此錄影帶之重要伏筆。

同時,美國國安局重要主管強沃特,垂涎權勢處心積慮欲制定影響通訊安全及隱私權之法案,遂對舊識之國會議員施壓,欲使該議員通過此法案──容許政府基於國家安全之理由,得使用高科技進行各種監聽、跟蹤、調查,尤其可以肆無忌憚的挖掘所有個人最底層的隱私。無奈該議員秉持良知不予配合,雙方在湖畔談判未果後,強沃特乃安排手下當場將該議員殺害,連人帶車沉入湖底。

家庭幸福、前途光明的律師威爾史密斯,正當他為太太選購聖誕禮物時,與久未謀面的喬治城大學同學(觀鳥專家)巧遇。沒想到幾分鐘後,這位同學深知性命危在旦夕,在受到極度驚嚇的情況下,急迫中將記錄著國會議員謀殺案的磁碟片塞入史密斯之購物袋中。他央求史密斯救他,在倉惶中拿了史密斯的名片後,便行色匆忙地逃跑了。就在他橫越馬路時,卻意外的發生車禍死亡。強沃特手下在其口袋中找出史密斯律師名片,乃鎖定史密斯並展開天羅地網的追緝,企圖嚴密控制史密斯的行蹤,藉以奪回磁碟片,並殺人滅口。

史密斯完全不知道自己已陷入一個難以脫身的謀殺案中,開始被人瘋狂追殺。而謀殺案主謀國安局主管強沃特以例行訓練指揮其屬下,展開一連串的跟監活動,濫用國安局之高科技配備,透過無線衛星連接網路可進行即時影像追蹤,在鋼筆、手機、手錶、衣服、以及皮鞋等物品,裝上竊聽器及追蹤器,進行地毯式的追捕。追緝過程中,國安局可掌握一個人的基本資料(姓名、職業、ID號碼、銀行紀錄、電話帳單等),將所有個人資料透過電腦網路連結、搜尋、取得、傳送。

電影中,史密斯的救兵是曾為國安局探員、現在轉為地下情報販子的金哈克曼。他對國家安全局的技倆一清二楚、並知道如何利用反制的方法和策略,以其人之道還治其人之身,透過反偵測迫使對手掉入陷阱,企圖將強沃特等繩之以法,但最後卻功敗垂成,兩人仍然被強沃特所擒。當史密斯被迫要交出磁碟片時,想到一個兩全齊美的錦囊妙計,謊稱該磁碟片已交給前述黑社會老大,導致強沃特和黑社會人馬展開一埸對決槍戰。史密斯幸運苟活,而金哈克曼則揚長而去!


Enemy of the State Trailer

Enemy of the State (1998) 完整影片!

Minority Report Trailer

Minority Report Trailer 2

🍎たったひとつの真実見抜く、見た目は大人、頭脳は子供、その名は名馬鹿ヒカル!🍏